One for sorrow, two for joy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f854b/f854b7cf74dad1b6450bb799b9278a73a03747ba" alt="One for sorrow, two for joy"
Jo Chew
Despard Gallery
Activism in the arts is a complex thing. There is art that is strident and obviously taking a position, and this is important, but it makes it easy for those opposing to dismiss it, by saying, near literally, that such art is ‘too political’ or that it’s ‘one-dimensional’. It’s interesting when this occurs, because it’s a great way of not engaging with whatever the art is saying (saying being a bit reductive, but I am using words here, so I’m going to have to do things like that now and again. Sory/Not Sorry).
Saying something is ‘too political’ is fascinating though. Have you heard anyone say that? I have, quite often. I wonder what it means, actually. I am genuinely unsure the more I consider the phrase, used dismissively and thrown away, oblivious to the intense weight of those words.
I am even more fascinated by the assertion that art is not political.